snowdeal logo

archives archives

ex machina


bulleted

  • comments on joel on offshoring
    [ " I'm not a software broker, I'm a software developer." ]
  • minimo
    [ "The Minimo (Mini Mozilla) project is focused on code-size and runtime footprint reduction, and porting to small consumer devices." ]
  • scoble is a microsoft blogger
    [ "I wanna own "Microsoft Blogger" on Google" ]
  • The DIY Zoning Project
    [ ... the complete solution is under $500 while the "professionally installed" systems start at about $5000..." ]

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/29/2004 11:21:44 PM

on the dogs getting ready to rumble with a skunk

great. there's a skunk meandering around close to the house and the dogs have started to notice. given their prior successes with killing a raccoon and a squirrel , i'm sure they're up for a tussle with skunk. at this point the skunk appears to be taunting them by staying on the other side of the fence and unfortunately i don't think the dogs know that they can get sprayed regardless of which side of the fence it's on.

so, anyone want to place bets on how long it'll be before i'm writing a post on how the dogs lost the battle with the skunk?

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/29/2004 10:11:35 PM

new york times doublespeak on personal blogs

is it just me or does the new york times' position against personal blogs due to a "burden of complete transparency" make no sense whatsoever? it would seem to me that a completely transparent organization would do just the opposite.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/29/2004 10:40:27 AM

bulleted

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/27/2004 09:14:26 PM

bulleted

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/26/2004 09:53:03 PM

bulleted

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/25/2004 09:03:17 PM

content:encoded decoded

the great thing about this whole blogging thing is how easy it is to make yourself look like an dope. in response to my plea for help with content:encoded , i'd like to thank the many people who more or less gently reminded me to think about the encoded part of content:encoded. that's right, i actually forgot to CDATA-escape the content. d'oh! you would think that since i run all content through tidy before posting that i would have remembered just a basic fact. hi. ho.

in any case, the feeds now not truncated and contain html, which is a good thing. i think. oh, i and fixed a stupid date error, so halleleujah my feeds are valid again.

so if it took me this long to fold-in html into my feeds how long do you think it'll take me to play with xml::atom ?

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/24/2004 09:13:30 PM

pregnancy update

if we've done our math correctly, the baby is 30 days old and now has a "rudimentary" face and is growing over a million cells a minute! one month down and only eight to go - it won't be long now.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/23/2004 09:32:58 PM

help with content:encoded and rss 1.0

so i decided that i was going to do a simple task that i should have done a long time ago - produce non-truncated versions of my syndication feeds without the html tags stripped. the feeds are all truncated at 500 characters and have the html removed because way back in the day, that's what the spec said was the Right Thing to Do with the 'description' element.

in response to the restrictiveness of the traditional 'description' element aaron swartz created content:encoded which was generally regarded as the Right Thing to Do with html-laden content. naturally, it took me two years to get around to playing the with "new" element.

after remembering how to get XML::RSS to import the content module, i'm off to the races and producing what looks to my naive eye to be a valid feed with content:encoded elements , but alas, it's not valid . i'm getting a "Undefined content_encoded element: p" error from the validator and netnewswire lite won't render the element at all, even though i'm fairly certain that it can handle content:encoded. so what gives? it anyone has any idea what dopey thing i'm going feel free to give me an earful . and before you ask, i'm pretty sure that doesn't have to do with the css class in th html, although i should just strip that out because it's useless legacy artifact.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/23/2004 09:14:30 PM

happy belated blog birthday to me!

somehow it escaped my attention that january 31st marked the 4 year anniversary of the vast wasteland. how time flies when you're having fun. here's to 4 more years.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/21/2004 10:09:40 AM

minor site fixes

i just noticed recently that the parallax and accidental marathonist sections were not loading the background color properly in safari due to my missing a closing paren in the in-line css. firefox and ie rendered it "properly" which is why i didn't catch it. it's all fixed now. considering that i know that a fair number of you are using safari and that you also visit both of those sections, i'm feeling a bit like the guy who walks around with a big piece of spinach stuck in his teeth while onlookers silently chuckle amongst themselves.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/21/2004 09:30:06 AM

on pregnancy and hormones

yeah, we've all heard the jokes about pregnancy and hormones. well, kris informed me that according to The Unofficial Guide to Having a Baby there's some truth behind the "raging hormones" humor:

"During pregnancy, your body will produce as much estrogen as a nonpregnant woman's body would make in 150 years - at mid-pregnancy, as much in a single day as a non-pregnant woman's ovaries produce in three years."
bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/20/2004 08:07:13 PM

bulleted

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/18/2004 08:17:55 PM

we're pregnant!

although it's a little tough to tell in the picture, that ept stick is positive for pregnancy! great geegaws, i'm going to be a daddy!

and now, we'll all pause for a moment while i hum (you're) Having My Baby.

it's still pretty early, less than 25 days, but the baby's first heartbeat was on sunday.

mom's doing fine. she's sleeping a lot more, but that's o.k.

i'm sure i'll have much, much more to share as events unfold.

and in related news, there must be something in the water, because my sister-in-law and her partner are pregnant as well - and if everyone has done their math correctly, the baby's due dates are within days of each other.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/17/2004 09:15:15 PM

bulleted

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/16/2004 07:53:20 PM

bulleted

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/13/2004 09:45:47 PM

NetNewsWire Atom Beta

well, despite all the rss/atom controversy, i'm happy to see the netnewswire atom beta is out. choice is good. may the best protocol win. maybe someday i'll get around to rolling my own custom atom feed and let my readers decide. relatedly, in a sign of smartness on yahoo's part, it looks like my yahoo's rss module can parse atom feeds.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/12/2004 08:28:45 PM

autumn of the mouse - updated

"am i still dreaming?" i thought, as i rubbed my eyes while listening to a breathless bbc reporter announce that comcast offered $66 billion for disney. a few moments later i realized that i wasn't and smiled at the perfect timing of the announcement, given the fact that i had spent the night dreaming about the implications of the thesis put forth in the "autumn of the moguls" , which i had finished before falling asleep - that the pathological ambitions of moguls have brought about the impending collapse of the "media business."

michael wolff makes him his most important point early. the modern "media business" is collapsing, because it's not really like any other business - that the word itself, media , is a made up concept. and that along the way, the morons that "architected" the aol time warners, the vivendis and the disneys of the world forgot that the, "...the entire industry is a fluke of semiotics." things started to go bad in the fifties when ad agencies started using the word to describe physical artifacts, such paper or film. one natural leap later the word became added to the saleman's vocabulary, as in "i sell media." notice the change? it went from something concrete to something less concrete. and from there is was twisted to mean all things related, "...to the abstract function of communication." (p.34) and on and on, towards more abstractions such as mcluhan's mantra on the media being the message. until in the 70s you had the emergence of something that hadn't existed before - media companies:

"This was just inflation. A useful bastardization of an already obtuse word. It was a Wall Street thing. We're more important that we were yesterday becaue we're no longer a broadcast company (notice how old fashioned that word sounds), we're a fucking media company.

But at no point in the development of the word and the of the concept of media was there an assumption that the television business and the magazine business and the radio business and billboard busines and music business and the movie business were the same business - that they should be run by the same person, that they required the same talents, or would, even, logically have the same investors or the same stars or the same audience." (p. 35)
it takes a little while for that to sink in, because we're so accustomed to thinking of "media" as an abstract concept that's merely packaged in different ways and sent along different distribution channels - cable or broadcast television, print or the internet. it doesn't even strike us that this might be an overextended metaphor that might be a trick of language. but it wasn't so long ago that the idea of a media company was considered absurd. wolff tells the story of a memo circulating in the new york times in the early seventies, "...advising reporters and editors that, in fact, there was no such thing as the media per se.." and that basically you were a lazy schmuck for using the word. it still seems odd, though, you might think. maybe wolff is pulling the old philosophical trick of "proving" that something doesn't exist that you know damn well does, in fact, exist. wolff finally beats you over the head with a reductio ad absurdum :
"It's as ridiculous as if someone had come along and invented the "transportation" business and, within the same company and under the same management, because they were all somehow related to the same word, put car companies and train companies and ship companies and airlines together." (p.35)
and yet the moguls - murdoch, isaacson, eisner, redstone, karmazin and diller et al, glossed over this, didn't understand, or didn't care - and went on building dysfunctional, disjointed, hollow, creaking empires held together only by the inertia of the next big deal. on and on, it went from one deal to another until things starting breaking down, with aol time warner and vivendi only being the most obvious effects of the underlying symptom [ he goes on at great length about the decaying carcass called disney, waiting to be devoured by the next big deal, if not for michael eisner's own obsessive mogul freakishness ] - that there really isn't anything synergistic about a vast media empire. and sooner or later, wolff believes sooner, the whole charade will come completely and totally flying apart.

in wolff's world each bigger deal is not a sign of the strength of super-consolidated media corporations, but rather the last dying gasps of an industry based on something that doesn't even exist. a giant bubble that has been expanding for over 30 years.

i don't know if it's true, and the book certainly has its flaws, but go read "autumn of the moguls" and you'll find the latest big media deal a whole lot more interesting. or sad.

updated: while he might not agree with the above reasoning, tim oren more succinctly states the premise in "Comcast / Disney: Dumb and Dumber":

"Let's keep this short and sweet. Anyone thinking they are going to merge a content business and a network transport business and add value hasn't been paying attention for at least ten years. "
bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/11/2004 09:17:07 PM

bulleted

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/10/2004 07:40:22 PM

on mozilla firefox [ and thunderbird ]

while some people of a certain age may have reservations about the new name given a clint eastwood movie of the same name, the fine folks at mozilla have released the successor to firebird - firefox. a word to the wise, if you're on os x. export your bookmarks from your existing firebird/phoenix/whatever profile and delete the profile directory. i followed the install instructions and disabled extensions and firefox appeared to start-up fine, but icons were missing in the nav bar, tabbed browsing didn't work, the scroll bars didn't appear on long pages etc etc. amusingly, it took me awhile to track down my bookmarks because it never occured to me that they would be in an old "phoenix" profile. after i backed-up the bookmarks and deleted the old profile everything is a-o-k. better than just o.k. actually. firefox is noticeably peppier than its predecessor in terms of start-up, windowing and page rendering. oh yeah - and if you delete your existing profile os x will default back to thinking that safari is your default browser, so then you have to remember that you have to change your default browser preference from within safari's preference instead of a "control panel" preference where it should be. nice

i just noticed that thunderbird 0.5 is also available. i guess i've got one more new thing to play with.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/09/2004 08:23:00 PM

on virtual hanging chads

despite some of scepticism regarding voting via the internet i did just that today by voting online in the michigan democratic caucus. amusingly, the online form had a bug in the "write-in" text fields that followed a set of radio buttons. the first "write-in" field was for the candidate and the second "write-in" field was for which party you were affiliated with - i.e. if you don't want to select a candidate or party-affiliation from the selected radio buttons, then you get to fill in a custom answer in the "write-in" field with each text field having a corresponding radio button. i discovered, that if you clicked on the radio button associated with the second "write-in" and then tried to select the text field, the form would deselect your selection for the candidate, making it appear that you didn't select a candidate. after much cussing at the computer screen, kris informed me that it would work if you didn't select the second radio button and simply clicked on the test field.

maybe it was a firebird glitch and the website did ask you to verify the selections after you submitted the form, but nonetheless i'm sure grandma would be confused.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/06/2004 11:26:52 PM

i know. i know.

i'm working on overhauling the rss script to deal with the 'bulleted' items. so maybe stripping all html tags wasn't such a good idea.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/06/2004 10:41:10 PM

bulleted

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/06/2004 10:19:03 PM

AIM Video Debuts, Links to iChat

hey, wasn't i just talking about apple screwing third party audio developers to protect their interests in ichat? in completely unrelated news, aim and ichat are getting cozier.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/05/2004 08:46:32 PM

bulleted

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/05/2004 08:33:38 PM

another day, another halliburton scandal

halliburton is in the news again; this time they are being investigated for paying a $180-million bribe in nigeria while vice-president dick cheney was running the show.

curiously, the u.s. press is silent , at least according to news.google.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/05/2004 06:47:11 PM

apple screws 3rd party audio developers

i like apple for the most part. i work in a heterogeneous world, but by-and-large, i enjoy my ibook and tend to stick with it through the good times and the bad. but i'm not a zealot and there are times when apple needs to get its head out of its corporate ass. take, for instance, its practice of screwing 3rd party audio application developers . presumably it's in some incomprehensible way meant to protect apple's interests in ichat [ i know i'm simplifying the situation, but bear with me ], but it really, really rubs me the wrong way. xten has developed a great cross-platform sip-client , which happens to suck on a mac because the sound quality issues.

of course, your average mac user wil probably blame xten because ichat works just fine. sigh

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/04/2004 09:14:25 PM

bulleted

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/03/2004 09:35:28 PM

wow. there's a first time for everything - updated

up until yesterday, i couldn't have told you who was in the superbowl, since i didn't seem to inherit the gene that compels one to get excited about football. however, there wasn't anything on teevee so i decided to check out the superbowl ads [ lame ]. much to my surprise, i actually found myself engaged by the game. kris is looking at me suspicously.

02.02.2004 update: well, apparently i wasn't as engaged as i thought, since i apparently missed all the good stuff.

bookmark: del.icio.us ::digg it ::furl ::reddit ::yahoo ::
  2/01/2004 10:32:54 PM

[ rhetoric ]

"it is hard to be brave," said piglet, sniffing slightly, "when you're only a Very Small Animal." rabbit, who had begun to write very busily, looked up and said: "it is because you are a very small animal that you will be Useful in the adventure before us."

the complete tales & poems of winnie the pooh

[ about ]

this site chronicles the continuing adventures of my son, odin, who was unexpectedly born on the fourth of july at 25 weeks gestation, weighing 1 pound 7 ounces.

he's quite a fighter and you can always send him a postcard to the most current address listed here if you're inspired by his adventures. see the postcard project/google maps mashup to see a map of the postcards.

if you're new, you can browse the archives to catch up. and don't forget to watch a few movies that i made while we were in the neonatal intensive care unit. or if you want the abridged version and you can find a copy, you can read about his adventures in the november 2005 issue of parents magazine.



[ search ]

[ outbound ]

daddytypes / blogging baby /

rebeldad / thingamababy / The Continuing Adventures of Super-Preemie / dooce /

[ schwag ]

look snazzy and support the site at the same time by buying some snowdeal schwag!

[ et cetera ]

valid xhtml 1.0?

This site designed by
Eric C. Snowdeal III .
© 2000-2005