great. there's a skunk meandering around close to the house and the
dogs have started to notice. given their prior successes with
killing
a raccoon
and
a squirrel
, i'm sure they're up for a tussle with skunk. at this point the
skunk appears to be taunting them by staying on the other side of
the fence and unfortunately i don't think the dogs know that they
can get sprayed regardless of which side of the fence it's on.
so, anyone want to place bets on how long it'll be before i'm writing a
post on how the dogs lost the battle with the skunk?
is it just me or does the new york times' position against personal blogs due to a "burden of complete transparency" make no sense whatsoever? it would seem to me that a completely transparent organization would do just the opposite.
the great thing about this whole blogging thing is how easy it
is to make yourself look like an dope. in response to my plea for
help with content:encoded
, i'd like to thank the many people who more or less gently
reminded me to think about the encoded part of content:encoded.
that's right, i actually forgot to CDATA-escape the content. d'oh!
you would think that since i run all content through
tidy
before posting that i would have remembered just a basic fact. hi.
ho.
in any case, the feeds now not truncated and contain html, which is
a good thing. i think. oh, i and fixed a stupid date error, so
halleleujah my feeds are
valid
again.
so if it took me this long to fold-in html into my feeds how long
do you think it'll take me to play with
xml::atom
?
if we've done our math correctly, the baby is 30 days old and now has a "rudimentary" face and is growing over a million cells a minute! one month down and only eight to go - it won't be long now.
so i decided that i was going to do a simple task that i should
have done a long time ago - produce non-truncated versions of my
syndication feeds without the html tags stripped. the feeds are all
truncated at 500 characters and have the html removed because way
back in the day, that's what the
spec said was
the Right Thing to Do
with the 'description' element.
in response to the restrictiveness of the traditional 'description'
element
aaron swartz
created
content:encoded
which was
generally regarded
as the Right Thing to Do with html-laden content. naturally, it
took me two years to get around to playing the with "new" element.
after remembering how to get
XML::RSS
to import the content module, i'm off to the races and producing
what looks to my naive eye to be a
valid feed with
content:encoded elements
, but alas, it's
not valid
. i'm getting a "Undefined content_encoded element: p" error from
the validator and
netnewswire
lite
won't render the element at all, even though i'm fairly certain
that it can handle content:encoded. so what gives? it anyone has
any idea what dopey thing i'm going feel free to
give me an earful
. and before you ask, i'm pretty sure that doesn't have to do with
the css class in th html, although i should just strip that out
because it's useless legacy artifact.
somehow it escaped my attention that january 31st marked the 4 year anniversary of the vast wasteland. how time flies when you're having fun. here's to 4 more years.
i just noticed recently that the parallax and accidental marathonist sections were not loading the background color properly in safari due to my missing a closing paren in the in-line css. firefox and ie rendered it "properly" which is why i didn't catch it. it's all fixed now. considering that i know that a fair number of you are using safari and that you also visit both of those sections, i'm feeling a bit like the guy who walks around with a big piece of spinach stuck in his teeth while onlookers silently chuckle amongst themselves.
yeah, we've all heard the jokes about pregnancy and hormones. well, kris informed me that according to The Unofficial Guide to Having a Baby there's some truth behind the "raging hormones" humor:
"During pregnancy, your body will produce as much estrogen as a nonpregnant woman's body would make in 150 years - at mid-pregnancy, as much in a single day as a non-pregnant woman's ovaries produce in three years."
although it's a little tough to tell in the picture, that ept stick is positive for pregnancy! great geegaws, i'm going to be a daddy!
and now, we'll all pause for a moment while i hum
(you're) Having My Baby.
it's still pretty early, less than 25 days, but the baby's first heartbeat was on sunday.
mom's doing fine. she's sleeping a lot more, but that's o.k.
i'm sure i'll have much, much more to share as events unfold.
and in related news, there must be something in the water, because my sister-in-law and her partner are pregnant as well - and if everyone has done their math correctly, the baby's due dates are within days of each other.
well, despite all the rss/atom controversy, i'm happy to see the netnewswire atom beta is out. choice is good. may the best protocol win. maybe someday i'll get around to rolling my own custom atom feed and let my readers decide. relatedly, in a sign of smartness on yahoo's part, it looks like my yahoo's rss module can parse atom feeds.
"am i still dreaming?" i thought, as i rubbed my
eyes while listening to a breathless
bbc
reporter announce that
comcast
offered $66 billion for disney. a few moments later i realized that i wasn't and smiled at the
perfect timing of the announcement, given the fact that i had spent
the night dreaming about the implications of the thesis put forth
in the
"autumn of the moguls"
, which i had finished before falling asleep - that the
pathological ambitions of moguls have brought about the impending
collapse of the "media business."
michael wolff makes him his most important point early. the modern
"media business" is collapsing, because it's not really like any
other business - that the word itself,
media
, is a made up concept. and that along the way, the morons that
"architected" the aol time warners, the vivendis and the disneys of
the world forgot that the, "...the entire industry is a fluke of
semiotics." things started to go bad in the fifties when ad
agencies started using the word to describe physical artifacts,
such paper or film. one natural leap later the word became added to
the saleman's vocabulary, as in "i sell media." notice the change?
it went from something concrete to something less concrete. and
from there is was twisted to mean all things related, "...to the
abstract function of communication." (p.34) and on and on, towards
more abstractions such as mcluhan's mantra on the media being the
message. until in the 70s you had the emergence of something that
hadn't existed before - media companies:
"This was just inflation. A useful bastardization of an already obtuse word. It was a Wall Street thing. We're more important that we were yesterday becaue we're no longer a broadcast company (notice how old fashioned that word sounds), we're a fucking media company.it takes a little while for that to sink in, because we're so accustomed to thinking of "media" as an abstract concept that's merely packaged in different ways and sent along different distribution channels - cable or broadcast television, print or the internet. it doesn't even strike us that this might be an overextended metaphor that might be a trick of language. but it wasn't so long ago that the idea of a media company was considered absurd. wolff tells the story of a memo circulating in the new york times in the early seventies, "...advising reporters and editors that, in fact, there was no such thing as the media per se.." and that basically you were a lazy schmuck for using the word. it still seems odd, though, you might think. maybe wolff is pulling the old philosophical trick of "proving" that something doesn't exist that you know damn well does, in fact, exist. wolff finally beats you over the head with a reductio ad absurdum :
But at no point in the development of the word and the of the concept of media was there an assumption that the television business and the magazine business and the radio business and billboard busines and music business and the movie business were the same business - that they should be run by the same person, that they required the same talents, or would, even, logically have the same investors or the same stars or the same audience." (p. 35)
"It's as ridiculous as if someone had come along and invented the "transportation" business and, within the same company and under the same management, because they were all somehow related to the same word, put car companies and train companies and ship companies and airlines together." (p.35)and yet the moguls - murdoch, isaacson, eisner, redstone, karmazin and diller et al, glossed over this, didn't understand, or didn't care - and went on building dysfunctional, disjointed, hollow, creaking empires held together only by the inertia of the next big deal. on and on, it went from one deal to another until things starting breaking down, with aol time warner and vivendi only being the most obvious effects of the underlying symptom [ he goes on at great length about the decaying carcass called disney, waiting to be devoured by the next big deal, if not for michael eisner's own obsessive mogul freakishness ] - that there really isn't anything synergistic about a vast media empire. and sooner or later, wolff believes sooner, the whole charade will come completely and totally flying apart.
"Let's keep this short and sweet. Anyone thinking they are going to merge a content business and a network transport business and add value hasn't been paying attention for at least ten years. "
while some people of a certain age may have reservations about the new name given a clint eastwood movie of the same name, the fine folks at mozilla have released the successor to firebird - firefox. a word to the wise, if you're on os x. export your bookmarks from your existing firebird/phoenix/whatever profile and delete the profile directory. i followed the install instructions and disabled extensions and firefox appeared to start-up fine, but icons were missing in the nav bar, tabbed browsing didn't work, the scroll bars didn't appear on long pages etc etc. amusingly, it took me awhile to track down my bookmarks because it never occured to me that they would be in an old "phoenix" profile. after i backed-up the bookmarks and deleted the old profile everything is a-o-k. better than just o.k. actually. firefox is noticeably peppier than its predecessor in terms of start-up, windowing and page rendering. oh yeah - and if you delete your existing profile os x will default back to thinking that safari is your default browser, so then you have to remember that you have to change your default browser preference from within safari's preference instead of a "control panel" preference where it should be. nice
i just noticed that thunderbird 0.5 is also available. i guess i've got one more new thing to play with.
despite some of scepticism regarding voting via the internet i did just that today by voting online in the michigan democratic caucus. amusingly, the online form had a bug in the "write-in" text fields that followed a set of radio buttons. the first "write-in" field was for the candidate and the second "write-in" field was for which party you were affiliated with - i.e. if you don't want to select a candidate or party-affiliation from the selected radio buttons, then you get to fill in a custom answer in the "write-in" field with each text field having a corresponding radio button. i discovered, that if you clicked on the radio button associated with the second "write-in" and then tried to select the text field, the form would deselect your selection for the candidate, making it appear that you didn't select a candidate. after much cussing at the computer screen, kris informed me that it would work if you didn't select the second radio button and simply clicked on the test field.
maybe it was a firebird glitch and the website did ask you to verify the selections after you submitted the form, but nonetheless i'm sure grandma would be confused.
i'm working on overhauling the rss script to deal with the 'bulleted' items. so maybe stripping all html tags wasn't such a good idea.
hey, wasn't i just talking about apple screwing third party audio developers to protect their interests in ichat? in completely unrelated news, aim and ichat are getting cozier.
halliburton
is in the news again; this time they are being investigated for
paying a $180-million bribe in nigeria
while vice-president dick cheney was running the show.
curiously, the u.s. press is
silent
, at least according to
news.google.
i like
apple
for the most part. i work in a heterogeneous world, but
by-and-large, i enjoy my
ibook
and tend to stick with it through the good times and the bad. but
i'm not a zealot and there are times when
apple
needs to get its head out of its corporate ass. take, for instance,
its practice of screwing 3rd party audio application developers
. presumably it's in some incomprehensible way meant to protect
apple's
interests in
ichat
[ i know i'm simplifying the situation, but bear with me ], but it
really, really rubs me the wrong way.
xten
has developed a great cross-platform
sip-client
, which happens to suck on a mac because the sound quality issues.
of course, your average mac user wil probably blame
xten
because
ichat
works just fine.
sigh
up until yesterday, i couldn't have told you who was in the superbowl, since i didn't seem to inherit the gene that compels one to get excited about football. however, there wasn't anything on teevee so i decided to check out the superbowl ads [ lame ]. much to my surprise, i actually found myself engaged by the game. kris is looking at me suspicously.
02.02.2004 update: well, apparently i wasn't as engaged as i thought, since i apparently missed all the good stuff.
“"it is hard to be brave," said piglet, sniffing slightly, "when you're only a Very Small Animal." rabbit, who had begun to write very busily, looked up and said: "it is because you are a very small animal that you will be Useful in the adventure before us."”
the complete tales & poems of winnie the poohthis site chronicles the continuing adventures of my son, odin, who was unexpectedly born on the fourth of july at 25 weeks gestation, weighing 1 pound 7 ounces.
he's quite a fighter and you can always send him a postcard to the most current address listed here if you're inspired by his adventures. see the postcard project/google maps mashup to see a map of the postcards.
if you're new, you can browse the archives to catch up. and don't forget to watch a few movies that i made while we were in the neonatal intensive care unit. or if you want the abridged version and you can find a copy, you can read about his adventures in the november 2005 issue of parents magazine.
daddytypes
/
blogging baby
/
rebeldad
/
thingamababy
/
The Continuing Adventures of Super-Preemie
/
dooce
/
look snazzy and support the site at the same time by buying some snowdeal schwag!
valid xhtml 1.0?
This site designed by
Eric C. Snowdeal III
.
© 2000-2005