"A year ago, I entertained audiences by encouraging fellow cynics to join the fight against the best and biggest example of bad business, the world's largest and most successful corporation, one that had figured out (and brilliantly so if I may say) how to escape responsibility for its devastating impact on people, communities, small businesses and the environment.
I am no longer leading that cheer."
"I am exhilarated. I am watching the Jolly Green Giant bend down and pick daisies rather than run blindly across the field crushing all in its path. I am hopeful, glad to have come, and ready to provide any and all with advice."
It's a common myth that OV stopped supplying product to Wal-Mart for pricing or 'Mission' reasons. Actually, OV discontinued the relationship with Wal-Mart because product of product shortages. At the time, Wal-Mart was a profitable customer but other long time customers were getting the short end of the stick on deliveries. OV decided they'd rather supply those 'that brought them to the dance' and told Wal-Mart they woulnd't be able to meet their order needs.
By , at 4:30 AM
thanks for the comment and clarifying my simplified version of history. my understanding, and i wasn't at OV at the time and don't speak officially for OV, is that endemic shorting required that we pick and choose customers to supply and in that context issues of pricing pressure and the adherence to the mission were used to prioritize customers. certainly customers 'that brought them to the dance' were higher on the supply list than those with a history of relentlessly driving prices down below what would support the family farmers that collectively own the OV brand. you are absolutely correct that wal-mart walked away and found another supplier when OV told them that they couldn't guarantee supply.
“"You're not a designer, you're not a writer, and you're not an editor!"
Well, no, blogger, you're not. And therein lies your gift. Because even if it's true the vast majority of blogs would not be missed by more than a handful of people were the earth to open up and swallow them, and even if the best are still no substitute for the sustained attention of literary or journalistic works, it's also true that sustained attention is not what Web logs are about anyway. At their most interesting they embody something that exceeds attention, and transforms it: They are constructed from and pay implicit tribute to a peculiarly contemporary sort of wonder.
...[T]he Web log reflects our own attempts to assimilate the glut of immaterial data loosed upon us by the "discovery" of the networked world. And there are surely lessons for us in the parallel. For just as the cabinet of wonders took centuries to evolve into the more orderly, logically crystalline museum, so it may be a while before the chaos of the Web submits to any very tidy scheme of organization.”
Feed [03.21.00]
wired
/
slashdot
/
tomalak
/
techdirt
/
bblog
/
webvoice
/
news.com
/
premium blend
/
techblog
/
the register
/
nyt technology
/
salon technology
/
ananova
/
msnbc
/
cs monitor
/
economist technology
/
silicon prairie
/
siliconvalley.com
/
corante
/
mediachannel
/
ojr
/
editor and publisher
/
hbs
/
marketing profs
/
business 2.0
/
red herring
/
fast company
/
darwin
/
a & l daily
/
nyt magazine
/
economist
/
reason
/
edge
/
ny review of books
/
look snazzy and support the site at the same time by buying some snowdeal schwag!
valid xhtml 1.0?
This site designed by
Eric C. Snowdeal III
.
© 2000-2005